Evolution of Morality

[kamesh]

While some philosophers and biologists hold that morality is a thin crust hiding egoism, amorality, and anti-social tendencies, others see morality as a product of evolutionary forces and as evidence for continuity with other group-living organisms. Proponents of what could be called "Natural Outgrowth Theory" see no conflict between evolutionary biology and morality since moral codes generally prescribe behavior that enhances individual fitness and group well-being.

Any more definitions for morality??

[Daniel]

I cannot accurately comment because I do not believe in evolution in a macro-sense, which I believe is what you are reffering to.

[Illuminatus]

I cannot accurately comment because I do not believe in evolution in a macro-sense, which I believe is what you are reffering to.

No, it still applies on the micro level. Though, it's essentially meaningless, as it makes eugenics and genocide moral, as well as immoral depending on what spin you give it.

[Daniel]

I suppose it's more of the evolution of the concept of morality as each persons concept will be relative for the majority of people.

[Krovisser]

While some philosophers and biologists hold that morality is a thin crust hiding egoism, amorality, and anti-social tendencies, others see morality as a product of evolutionary forces and as evidence for continuity with other group-living organisms. Proponents of what could be called "Natural Outgrowth Theory" see no conflict between evolutionary biology and morality since moral codes generally prescribe behavior that enhances individual fitness and group well-being.

Any more definitions for morality??

I agree with the first part: "morality is a thin crust hiding egoism, amorality, and anti-social tendencies" and I also disagree...